<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761333</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner, affirming the ITAT&#039;s exclusion of Infosys BPO Ltd. and TCS E-serve Ltd. from comparables in determining the arm&#039;s length price for international transactions. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s acceptance of low margin comparables and rejected the challenge to the stringent comparability standards, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 20:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761333</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner, affirming the ITAT&#039;s exclusion of Infosys BPO Ltd. and TCS E-serve Ltd. from comparables in determining the arm&#039;s length price for international transactions. The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s acceptance of low margin comparables and rejected the challenge to the stringent comparability standards, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>