<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 325 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761339</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging CAT&#039;s decision to set aside disciplinary charges against a Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). The respondent was charged with hastily deleting an addition while deciding an appeal. However, the HC found that the premise for the charge-sheet vanished when ITAT remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision following HC Calcutta&#039;s direction. The court held that the Department&#039;s delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings was fatal, especially since they were aware of the alleged negligent act from the beginning but took no action until 2017. The gravity of charges was diluted by subsequent judicial developments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 325 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761339</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed a writ petition challenging CAT&#039;s decision to set aside disciplinary charges against a Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). The respondent was charged with hastily deleting an addition while deciding an appeal. However, the HC found that the premise for the charge-sheet vanished when ITAT remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision following HC Calcutta&#039;s direction. The court held that the Department&#039;s delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings was fatal, especially since they were aware of the alleged negligent act from the beginning but took no action until 2017. The gravity of charges was diluted by subsequent judicial developments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>