<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 335 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761349</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment order. Technical portal issues and lack of proper notice were key concerns. Court set aside original order, requiring petitioner to deposit 25% of disputed tax and providing four weeks to submit objections. Order will be revived if compliance conditions are not met. Petition disposed without costs, offering procedural relief to taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 21:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 335 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761349</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to GST assessment order. Technical portal issues and lack of proper notice were key concerns. Court set aside original order, requiring petitioner to deposit 25% of disputed tax and providing four weeks to submit objections. Order will be revived if compliance conditions are not met. Petition disposed without costs, offering procedural relief to taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>