<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 338 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761352</link>
    <description>The HC quashed an order dated 16.08.2024 passed by the Joint Commissioner (Adjudication), Central GST Commissionerate, Ghaziabad for violating principles of natural justice. Despite multiple hearings held between February and July 2024, the petitioner was not afforded adequate opportunity after document supply, and the court&#039;s previous directions dated 30.05.2024 were not followed. The finding regarding alleged fraud was deemed ipse dixit without proper consideration. The matter was remanded back to the Joint Commissioner with directions to provide proper hearing opportunity, follow previous court directions, and pass a fresh order after appropriately dealing with the fraud allegations. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=777008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 338 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761352</link>
      <description>The HC quashed an order dated 16.08.2024 passed by the Joint Commissioner (Adjudication), Central GST Commissionerate, Ghaziabad for violating principles of natural justice. Despite multiple hearings held between February and July 2024, the petitioner was not afforded adequate opportunity after document supply, and the court&#039;s previous directions dated 30.05.2024 were not followed. The finding regarding alleged fraud was deemed ipse dixit without proper consideration. The matter was remanded back to the Joint Commissioner with directions to provide proper hearing opportunity, follow previous court directions, and pass a fresh order after appropriately dealing with the fraud allegations. The petition was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>