<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458600</link>
    <description>The SC concluded that the industrial dispute was barred by res judicata, as it involved the same subject matter as prior writ proceedings. The SC set aside the HC and Labour Court decisions, asserting the Labour Court&#039;s lack of jurisdiction. The appellant cannot recover payments made to the respondent, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458600</link>
      <description>The SC concluded that the industrial dispute was barred by res judicata, as it involved the same subject matter as prior writ proceedings. The SC set aside the HC and Labour Court decisions, asserting the Labour Court&#039;s lack of jurisdiction. The appellant cannot recover payments made to the respondent, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>