<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1464 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458586</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. It admitted a corrigendum to the original valuation report, which corrected an error in the valuation method under sec. 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the valuation, emphasizing accurate determination of Fair Market Value for tax liability assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 19:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1464 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458586</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes. It admitted a corrigendum to the original valuation report, which corrected an error in the valuation method under sec. 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ITAT directed the AO to reexamine the valuation, emphasizing accurate determination of Fair Market Value for tax liability assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>