<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 279 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761293</link>
    <description>The petitioner contested summons issued under Section 70 of the CGST Act regarding Input Tax Credit claims from previous years. Despite multiple summons being issued, the HC directed tax authorities to decide on the petitioner&#039;s reply within two months. The writ petition was disposed of with this direction, requiring authorities to conclude their assessment within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 279 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761293</link>
      <description>The petitioner contested summons issued under Section 70 of the CGST Act regarding Input Tax Credit claims from previous years. Despite multiple summons being issued, the HC directed tax authorities to decide on the petitioner&#039;s reply within two months. The writ petition was disposed of with this direction, requiring authorities to conclude their assessment within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>