<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 279 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761293</link>
    <description>Summons issued under Section 70 of the CGST Act were challenged on the ground that the authorities lacked jurisdiction under Section 6(2)(b), and the petitioner also sought prompt consideration of its reply. The writ petition was disposed of by directing the authorities to take an appropriate decision on the petitioner&#039;s reply within the time granted by the Court and to communicate the order to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 279 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761293</link>
      <description>Summons issued under Section 70 of the CGST Act were challenged on the ground that the authorities lacked jurisdiction under Section 6(2)(b), and the petitioner also sought prompt consideration of its reply. The writ petition was disposed of by directing the authorities to take an appropriate decision on the petitioner&#039;s reply within the time granted by the Court and to communicate the order to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>