https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761281 CESTAT Chandigarh dismissed 4 appeals filed by Revenue against 399 Bills of Entry as not maintainable. The tribunal interpreted Rule 6(A) of CESTAT Procedure Rules, holding that when multiple order-in-original are passed, separate appeals must be filed for each order. Since Commissioner (Appeals) passed 4 orders covering 399 Bills of Entry, Revenue was required to file 399 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry as individual assessment orders. The tribunal relied on precedents from Ahmedabad Bench and J&K HC, directing Revenue to file 399 appeals instead of 4 if they choose to proceed. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:50:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761281 CESTAT Chandigarh dismissed 4 appeals filed by Revenue against 399 Bills of Entry as not maintainable. The tribunal interpreted Rule 6(A) of CESTAT Procedure Rules, holding that when multiple order-in-original are passed, separate appeals must be filed for each order. Since Commissioner (Appeals) passed 4 orders covering 399 Bills of Entry, Revenue was required to file 399 separate appeals challenging each Bill of Entry as individual assessment orders. The tribunal relied on precedents from Ahmedabad Bench and J&K HC, directing Revenue to file 399 appeals instead of 4 if they choose to proceed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761281