<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (12) TMI 54 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39140</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1966-67. The petitioners, a foreign non-resident company, contested the validity of the notice addressed to a director regarding alleged income escaping assessment. The court held that the director&#039;s connection with the company&#039;s legal affairs was sufficient to deem him the principal officer. The judge emphasized that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s intention, if supported by material, was crucial in determining the director&#039;s status. The court differentiated the director&#039;s role from that of an official liquidator and upheld the officer&#039;s decision, ultimately rejecting the application and vacating interim orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 12:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (12) TMI 54 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39140</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1966-67. The petitioners, a foreign non-resident company, contested the validity of the notice addressed to a director regarding alleged income escaping assessment. The court held that the director&#039;s connection with the company&#039;s legal affairs was sufficient to deem him the principal officer. The judge emphasized that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s intention, if supported by material, was crucial in determining the director&#039;s status. The court differentiated the director&#039;s role from that of an official liquidator and upheld the officer&#039;s decision, ultimately rejecting the application and vacating interim orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>