<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Foreign Exchange Contracts with Actual Delivery Not Speculative; Expenses Allowed as Expenditure per ITAT Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82881</link>
    <description>Disallowance of provision for foreign exchange fluctuations and loss on forward contracts u/s 43(5) regarding speculative transactions. It clarifies that foreign currency is not a trading commodity, and the provisions of Section 43(5) are not applicable. To qualify as a speculative transaction, there should be a contract for purchase or sale of a commodity settled on a net-net basis without actual delivery. In this case, the contracts were settled by actual delivery, not on a net-to-net basis, and hence do not fall within the meaning of a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Woodward Governor India (P.) Ltd, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the provision for foreign exchange fluctuations and loss on forward contracts as expenditure for the year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Foreign Exchange Contracts with Actual Delivery Not Speculative; Expenses Allowed as Expenditure per ITAT Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82881</link>
      <description>Disallowance of provision for foreign exchange fluctuations and loss on forward contracts u/s 43(5) regarding speculative transactions. It clarifies that foreign currency is not a trading commodity, and the provisions of Section 43(5) are not applicable. To qualify as a speculative transaction, there should be a contract for purchase or sale of a commodity settled on a net-net basis without actual delivery. In this case, the contracts were settled by actual delivery, not on a net-to-net basis, and hence do not fall within the meaning of a speculative transaction u/s 43(5). Following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Woodward Governor India (P.) Ltd, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the provision for foreign exchange fluctuations and loss on forward contracts as expenditure for the year.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>