<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Reopening Valid; Tax Loss Disallowance Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence of Price Manipulation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82878</link>
    <description>The reopening of assessment proceedings u/s 147 was valid as the Assessing Officer (AO) had received information about the assessee booking tax loss through trade in shares, which could not be considered a mere change of opinion. The AO provided independent findings regarding trading in shares of M/s. Radhe Developers Ltd., and the assessee&#039;s objections were not tenable. The decisions in NDTV, Calcutta Discount, Parshuram Potteries, and Bombay Stock Exchange cases were not relevant as the reopening was specific to trading in M/s. Radhe Developers Ltd.&#039;s scrip and not just a second opinion. However, the disallowance of loss in share trading was not sustained as the AO and CIT(A) did not correlate the trading with price fluctuations of M/s. R.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Reopening Valid; Tax Loss Disallowance Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence of Price Manipulation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82878</link>
      <description>The reopening of assessment proceedings u/s 147 was valid as the Assessing Officer (AO) had received information about the assessee booking tax loss through trade in shares, which could not be considered a mere change of opinion. The AO provided independent findings regarding trading in shares of M/s. Radhe Developers Ltd., and the assessee&#039;s objections were not tenable. The decisions in NDTV, Calcutta Discount, Parshuram Potteries, and Bombay Stock Exchange cases were not relevant as the reopening was specific to trading in M/s. Radhe Developers Ltd.&#039;s scrip and not just a second opinion. However, the disallowance of loss in share trading was not sustained as the AO and CIT(A) did not correlate the trading with price fluctuations of M/s. R.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>