<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Beneficiary&#039;s Delayed Appeal Permitted After Trust&#039;s Dismissal; Unexplained Cash Deposits Under Scrutiny.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82872</link>
    <description>Assessment order u/s 143(3) passed against an individual beneficiary, determining the primary assessee liable for taxation. The key points are: the assessment order was passed against the individual beneficiary, not the trust. Although the trust is the primary assessee u/s 160(1)(iv), the department can directly assess the beneficiary u/s 166. Since the assessment was framed against the beneficiary, the beneficiary should have filed an appeal before the CIT(Appeals), not the trust. The trust&#039;s appeal is dismissed, and the beneficiary is allowed to file a delayed appeal before the CIT(Appeals), who is directed to adopt a liberal approach regarding the delay. The issue pertains to the determination of the primary assessee liable for taxation and the unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, where no source was provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Beneficiary&#039;s Delayed Appeal Permitted After Trust&#039;s Dismissal; Unexplained Cash Deposits Under Scrutiny.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82872</link>
      <description>Assessment order u/s 143(3) passed against an individual beneficiary, determining the primary assessee liable for taxation. The key points are: the assessment order was passed against the individual beneficiary, not the trust. Although the trust is the primary assessee u/s 160(1)(iv), the department can directly assess the beneficiary u/s 166. Since the assessment was framed against the beneficiary, the beneficiary should have filed an appeal before the CIT(Appeals), not the trust. The trust&#039;s appeal is dismissed, and the beneficiary is allowed to file a delayed appeal before the CIT(Appeals), who is directed to adopt a liberal approach regarding the delay. The issue pertains to the determination of the primary assessee liable for taxation and the unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, where no source was provided.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>