<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 197 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761211</link>
    <description>Delhi HC dismissed petition challenging summoning order in dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 NI Act. Court held complaint filed on 13th August 2019 was within limitation as the last date (10th August) was a court holiday, applying Section 4 Limitation Act 1963. Cheque returned on 25th May 2019 for insufficient funds, legal notice issued on 21st June 2019, received on 24th June 2019. Fifteen-day statutory period expired on 9th July 2019, causing action to arise on 10th July 2019. MM correctly issued summons based on pre-summoning evidence via affidavit under Section 145 NI Act. ASJ properly upheld summoning order. No grounds found for interference under Section 482 CrPC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 197 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761211</link>
      <description>Delhi HC dismissed petition challenging summoning order in dishonour of cheque case under Section 138 NI Act. Court held complaint filed on 13th August 2019 was within limitation as the last date (10th August) was a court holiday, applying Section 4 Limitation Act 1963. Cheque returned on 25th May 2019 for insufficient funds, legal notice issued on 21st June 2019, received on 24th June 2019. Fifteen-day statutory period expired on 9th July 2019, causing action to arise on 10th July 2019. MM correctly issued summons based on pre-summoning evidence via affidavit under Section 145 NI Act. ASJ properly upheld summoning order. No grounds found for interference under Section 482 CrPC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>