https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761211 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as within limitation because the statutory notice was issued in time, the drawer did not pay within fifteen days, and the complaint was filed by excluding the day the cause of action arose. Since the one-month filing period expired on a day when the court was closed, filing on the next working day was permissible under the Limitation Act, 1963. The record also showed that the original legal notice was before the court and the Magistrate had issued summons on pre-summoning affidavit evidence. No illegality was found in the summoning or revisional orders, and interference under Section 482 CrPC was declined. en-us Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761211 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as within limitation because the statutory notice was issued in time, the drawer did not pay within fifteen days, and the complaint was filed by excluding the day the cause of action arose. Since the one-month filing period expired on a day when the court was closed, filing on the next working day was permissible under the Limitation Act, 1963. The record also showed that the original legal notice was before the court and the Magistrate had issued summons on pre-summoning affidavit evidence. No illegality was found in the summoning or revisional orders, and interference under Section 482 CrPC was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761211