<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 202 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761216</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed appeals by remand after finding violations of natural justice principles where the adjudicating authority failed to provide adequate personal hearings, giving only one notice for two consecutive dates instead of the required minimum three opportunities. The tribunal set aside personal penalty imposed on a partnership firm partner, following Gujarat HC precedent that separate penalties cannot be levied on partners. The redemption fine was also set aside as goods were unavailable for confiscation, consistent with established precedent. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication following natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 202 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761216</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed appeals by remand after finding violations of natural justice principles where the adjudicating authority failed to provide adequate personal hearings, giving only one notice for two consecutive dates instead of the required minimum three opportunities. The tribunal set aside personal penalty imposed on a partnership firm partner, following Gujarat HC precedent that separate penalties cannot be levied on partners. The redemption fine was also set aside as goods were unavailable for confiscation, consistent with established precedent. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication following natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>