https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761218 CESTAT Chandigarh ruled on Cenvat credit claimed on photocopies of invoices from broadcasting service providers. The tribunal found no intention to evade service tax as returns were regularly filed. Extended limitation period was rejected due to lack of suppression intent. Demand confirmed only for normal limitation period (October 2008-March 2009) with interest but no penalties. Earlier period (March 2005-September 2007) was time-barred. Matter remanded for quantification of wrongly availed credit for the confirmed period. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761218 CESTAT Chandigarh ruled on Cenvat credit claimed on photocopies of invoices from broadcasting service providers. The tribunal found no intention to evade service tax as returns were regularly filed. Extended limitation period was rejected due to lack of suppression intent. Demand confirmed only for normal limitation period (October 2008-March 2009) with interest but no penalties. Earlier period (March 2005-September 2007) was time-barred. Matter remanded for quantification of wrongly availed credit for the confirmed period. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761218