<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 221 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761235</link>
    <description>The ITAT Raipur dismissed the appeal filed by a discretionary trust against an assessment order passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The assessment order was issued against an individual beneficiary for unexplained cash deposits under Section 69A, but the trust filed the appeal instead of the beneficiary. The tribunal held that while the trust is the primary assessee under Section 160(1)(iv), the department can directly assess the beneficiary under Section 166. Since the assessment was made against the beneficiary, only she had the right to appeal. The beneficiary was granted liberty to file a delayed appeal before the CIT(Appeals) with liberal consideration for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 221 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761235</link>
      <description>The ITAT Raipur dismissed the appeal filed by a discretionary trust against an assessment order passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The assessment order was issued against an individual beneficiary for unexplained cash deposits under Section 69A, but the trust filed the appeal instead of the beneficiary. The tribunal held that while the trust is the primary assessee under Section 160(1)(iv), the department can directly assess the beneficiary under Section 166. Since the assessment was made against the beneficiary, only she had the right to appeal. The beneficiary was granted liberty to file a delayed appeal before the CIT(Appeals) with liberal consideration for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>