<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 230 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761244</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the validity of reopening proceedings u/s 147 based on investigation wing information regarding tax loss trades in shares. The tribunal found the reopening was not a change of opinion as the assessee failed to provide specific details about trading in M/s. Radhe Developers Ltd. scrip during earlier proceedings. However, regarding disallowance of trading losses, ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that neither the AO nor CIT(A) established any correlation between the assessee&#039;s trading and price manipulation or synchronized trading activities. The authorities failed to demonstrate the assessee&#039;s active involvement in price manipulation during AY 2011-12.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 230 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761244</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad upheld the validity of reopening proceedings u/s 147 based on investigation wing information regarding tax loss trades in shares. The tribunal found the reopening was not a change of opinion as the assessee failed to provide specific details about trading in M/s. Radhe Developers Ltd. scrip during earlier proceedings. However, regarding disallowance of trading losses, ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that neither the AO nor CIT(A) established any correlation between the assessee&#039;s trading and price manipulation or synchronized trading activities. The authorities failed to demonstrate the assessee&#039;s active involvement in price manipulation during AY 2011-12.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>