<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 234 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761248</link>
    <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition of income from house property based on estimated rent. The AO contended assessee received lower rent from one party compared to others. The assessee argued property was leased for continuous long periods to third parties, negating deemed rent under section 23(1)(a). The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision in assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2015-16 and distinguished revenue&#039;s cited case as it involved related parties. Here, leases were to unrelated third parties on commercial terms, with one tenant being a non-profit blood bank incidental to hospital operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 20:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 234 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761248</link>
      <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition of income from house property based on estimated rent. The AO contended assessee received lower rent from one party compared to others. The assessee argued property was leased for continuous long periods to third parties, negating deemed rent under section 23(1)(a). The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision in assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2015-16 and distinguished revenue&#039;s cited case as it involved related parties. Here, leases were to unrelated third parties on commercial terms, with one tenant being a non-profit blood bank incidental to hospital operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>