<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 238 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761252</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that reassessment proceedings against a trust were invalid and quashed the reassessment order. The tribunal ruled that reassessment cannot be initiated merely for non-registration under sections 12A/12AA of the Act. The assessee trust obtained registration under section 12AA one day after the reassessment notice was issued, making the assessment proceedings pending at the time of registration. Under the second proviso to section 12A(2), the trust was entitled to exemption benefits for preceding assessment years since assessment proceedings were pending when registration was granted. The tribunal relied on Karnataka State Welfare Fund and other precedents establishing that reopening assessments solely for non-registration violates statutory provisions and is not warranted under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 238 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761252</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that reassessment proceedings against a trust were invalid and quashed the reassessment order. The tribunal ruled that reassessment cannot be initiated merely for non-registration under sections 12A/12AA of the Act. The assessee trust obtained registration under section 12AA one day after the reassessment notice was issued, making the assessment proceedings pending at the time of registration. Under the second proviso to section 12A(2), the trust was entitled to exemption benefits for preceding assessment years since assessment proceedings were pending when registration was granted. The tribunal relied on Karnataka State Welfare Fund and other precedents establishing that reopening assessments solely for non-registration violates statutory provisions and is not warranted under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>