<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761257</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding bogus purchases. The CIT(A) had partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by restricting the addition to 16.5% of the amount disallowed by the AO as additional taxable income, without providing benefit of expenses. The ITAT found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, noting the absence of evidence or arguments contradicting the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and conclusions, thereby upholding the 16.5% addition for bogus purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 243 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761257</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding bogus purchases. The CIT(A) had partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by restricting the addition to 16.5% of the amount disallowed by the AO as additional taxable income, without providing benefit of expenses. The ITAT found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, noting the absence of evidence or arguments contradicting the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and conclusions, thereby upholding the 16.5% addition for bogus purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>