<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39132</link>
    <description>The court determined that the expenses incurred by the assessee in supplying coffee, tea, cigarettes, and meals to customers constituted entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court rejected the argument that only lavish hospitality qualifies as entertainment, stating that any hospitality extended in connection with business falls within the scope of entertainment expenditure. The decision favored the department over the assessee, with the Tribunal&#039;s ruling being deemed erroneous. Each party was directed to bear their respective costs, and a copy of the judgment was to be forwarded to the Tribunal as per statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39132</link>
      <description>The court determined that the expenses incurred by the assessee in supplying coffee, tea, cigarettes, and meals to customers constituted entertainment expenditure under section 37(2A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court rejected the argument that only lavish hospitality qualifies as entertainment, stating that any hospitality extended in connection with business falls within the scope of entertainment expenditure. The decision favored the department over the assessee, with the Tribunal&#039;s ruling being deemed erroneous. Each party was directed to bear their respective costs, and a copy of the judgment was to be forwarded to the Tribunal as per statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>