<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 252 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761266</link>
    <description>The SC, led by CJI Chandrachud, resolved Special Leave Petitions by aligning with the precedent set in Union of India vs Rajeev Bansal. Assessing officers are required to adhere to the legal principles established in Rajeev Bansal. Aggrieved assessees may seek remedies for unresolved issues, while pending applications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 252 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761266</link>
      <description>The SC, led by CJI Chandrachud, resolved Special Leave Petitions by aligning with the precedent set in Union of India vs Rajeev Bansal. Assessing officers are required to adhere to the legal principles established in Rajeev Bansal. Aggrieved assessees may seek remedies for unresolved issues, while pending applications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>