<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 257 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761271</link>
    <description>A subsequent order for the same tax period cannot be sustained where a final order for that period had already been passed and was under appeal. The text states that the challenged order dated 23 April 2024 related to the same tax period as the earlier final order dated 01 February 2021, so the later order lacked basis and could not stand. On that footing, the impugned order was quashed and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 257 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761271</link>
      <description>A subsequent order for the same tax period cannot be sustained where a final order for that period had already been passed and was under appeal. The text states that the challenged order dated 23 April 2024 related to the same tax period as the earlier final order dated 01 February 2021, so the later order lacked basis and could not stand. On that footing, the impugned order was quashed and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>