<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458575</link>
    <description>At a preliminary stage, where adjudication proceedings had not yet commenced, the Madras HC declined to quash the seizure of gold ornaments but held that provisional release was appropriate subject to a monetary deposit condition. The court balanced the pending nature of the proceedings against the petitioner&#039;s request for interim relief, directed release of the seized jewellery on deposit through the petitioner&#039;s power agent, and required full cooperation for the early conclusion of adjudication. The seizure therefore remained in force at that stage, while interim custody of the goods was permitted on conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 08:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458575</link>
      <description>At a preliminary stage, where adjudication proceedings had not yet commenced, the Madras HC declined to quash the seizure of gold ornaments but held that provisional release was appropriate subject to a monetary deposit condition. The court balanced the pending nature of the proceedings against the petitioner&#039;s request for interim relief, directed release of the seized jewellery on deposit through the petitioner&#039;s power agent, and required full cooperation for the early conclusion of adjudication. The seizure therefore remained in force at that stage, while interim custody of the goods was permitted on conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>