<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1360 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458559</link>
    <description>The HC admitted the petitions filed by the petitioners, Sunil Kothari and Balwant Singh, against the respondent company. It deferred the order on admission, appointment of a provisional liquidator, and publication of citations for six weeks, allowing time for negotiations or deposit of principal amounts. The issue of interest remains unresolved, with the matter scheduled for re-listing on 1st February 2011. The court dismissed Welldone Estate Projects Private Limited&#039;s petition due to the absence of a written contract. The court emphasized the respondent&#039;s personal liability in the agreements and rejected the defense of acting as an agent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 19:52:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1360 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458559</link>
      <description>The HC admitted the petitions filed by the petitioners, Sunil Kothari and Balwant Singh, against the respondent company. It deferred the order on admission, appointment of a provisional liquidator, and publication of citations for six weeks, allowing time for negotiations or deposit of principal amounts. The issue of interest remains unresolved, with the matter scheduled for re-listing on 1st February 2011. The court dismissed Welldone Estate Projects Private Limited&#039;s petition due to the absence of a written contract. The court emphasized the respondent&#039;s personal liability in the agreements and rejected the defense of acting as an agent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>