<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1400 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458556</link>
    <description>The HC discharged the Rule and dismissed the Petition, directing the Petitioner to cooperate with the Appellate Authority to expedite the appeal process. The HC emphasized the principle of exhausting alternative remedies, deeming the Writ Petition not maintainable. The Petitioner was allowed to retain official accommodation during the appeal&#039;s pendency, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 14:15:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1400 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458556</link>
      <description>The HC discharged the Rule and dismissed the Petition, directing the Petitioner to cooperate with the Appellate Authority to expedite the appeal process. The HC emphasized the principle of exhausting alternative remedies, deeming the Writ Petition not maintainable. The Petitioner was allowed to retain official accommodation during the appeal&#039;s pendency, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>