<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 585 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458557</link>
    <description>The Co. sanctioned the modified scheme proposed by the Sabha, benefiting workers, secured creditors, and shareholders. The original scheme was rejected due to opposition from workers and the secured creditor. The Co. emphasized its role under Sections 391 and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956, in ensuring a fair and workable scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 14:15:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 585 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458557</link>
      <description>The Co. sanctioned the modified scheme proposed by the Sabha, benefiting workers, secured creditors, and shareholders. The original scheme was rejected due to opposition from workers and the secured creditor. The Co. emphasized its role under Sections 391 and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956, in ensuring a fair and workable scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>