<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules in Favor of Manufacturer for MEIS Benefits Despite Clerical Error in Shipping Documentation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82827</link>
    <description>The Petitioner, a manufacturer of Asbestos Free brake-lining and Brake pads &amp; brake shoes, exported these items under 28 shipping bills. However, due to a technical difficulty, the Petitioner inadvertently marked &#039;N&#039; instead of &#039;Y&#039; in the &quot;reward item box&quot; for claiming rewards under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS). Consequently, these shipping bills were not transmitted for granting rewards. The Policy Relaxation Committee rejected the Petitioner&#039;s claim for release of the admissible reward amounts under MEIS. The High Court, relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in N.C. John case and Mangalath Cashews, ANU Cashew cases, held that where there is an inadvertent mistake of mentioning &#039;N&#039; instead of &#039;Y&#039; and the claimant had .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules in Favor of Manufacturer for MEIS Benefits Despite Clerical Error in Shipping Documentation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82827</link>
      <description>The Petitioner, a manufacturer of Asbestos Free brake-lining and Brake pads &amp; brake shoes, exported these items under 28 shipping bills. However, due to a technical difficulty, the Petitioner inadvertently marked &#039;N&#039; instead of &#039;Y&#039; in the &quot;reward item box&quot; for claiming rewards under the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS). Consequently, these shipping bills were not transmitted for granting rewards. The Policy Relaxation Committee rejected the Petitioner&#039;s claim for release of the admissible reward amounts under MEIS. The High Court, relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in N.C. John case and Mangalath Cashews, ANU Cashew cases, held that where there is an inadvertent mistake of mentioning &#039;N&#039; instead of &#039;Y&#039; and the claimant had .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>