<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules in Favor of Petitioner: No Evidence of Duty Evasion or Misrepresentation, Upholds Natural Justice Principles.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82820</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner - adjudicating authority failed to consider petitioner&#039;s reply while passing impugned order - assessment period covered by earlier orders of coordinate authorities - principles of natural justice violated - doctrine of res judicata applicable. Careful perusal of first appellate authority&#039;s order revealed core issue was production capacity of machine, concluded based on evidence as 301-750 pouches per minute, contrary to adjudicating authority&#039;s subsequent finding of above 751 pouches. First appellate authority interfered with adjudicating authority&#039;s order, holding it unsupported.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules in Favor of Petitioner: No Evidence of Duty Evasion or Misrepresentation, Upholds Natural Justice Principles.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82820</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner - adjudicating authority failed to consider petitioner&#039;s reply while passing impugned order - assessment period covered by earlier orders of coordinate authorities - principles of natural justice violated - doctrine of res judicata applicable. Careful perusal of first appellate authority&#039;s order revealed core issue was production capacity of machine, concluded based on evidence as 301-750 pouches per minute, contrary to adjudicating authority&#039;s subsequent finding of above 751 pouches. First appellate authority interfered with adjudicating authority&#039;s order, holding it unsupported.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>