<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Directors Can&#039;t Escape Liability for Cheque Dishonor by Claiming Non-Involvement; Supreme Court Dismisses Quash Petition.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82814</link>
    <description>A director of a company cannot evade vicarious liability for the offence of dishonor of cheque u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by merely claiming to be a housewife and not involved in the company&#039;s affairs. The High Court held that while exercising jurisdiction u/s 482 CrPC to quash a complaint, it must be extremely cautious and do so only in rarest of rare cases where allegations are patently absurd and inherently improbable. The Supreme Court in S.P. Mani &amp; Mohan Dairy v. Snehalatha Elangovan clarified that Section 141 extends criminal liability to every person in charge and responsible for the company&#039;s conduct at the time of the offence. The director, being one of only three directors, cannot claim to be unaware or uninvolved .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Directors Can&#039;t Escape Liability for Cheque Dishonor by Claiming Non-Involvement; Supreme Court Dismisses Quash Petition.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82814</link>
      <description>A director of a company cannot evade vicarious liability for the offence of dishonor of cheque u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by merely claiming to be a housewife and not involved in the company&#039;s affairs. The High Court held that while exercising jurisdiction u/s 482 CrPC to quash a complaint, it must be extremely cautious and do so only in rarest of rare cases where allegations are patently absurd and inherently improbable. The Supreme Court in S.P. Mani &amp; Mohan Dairy v. Snehalatha Elangovan clarified that Section 141 extends criminal liability to every person in charge and responsible for the company&#039;s conduct at the time of the offence. The director, being one of only three directors, cannot claim to be unaware or uninvolved .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>