<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 110 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761124</link>
    <description>HC granted anticipatory bail to applicants charged under IPC Sections 406, 408, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477A read with Section 34 for financial fraud and conspiracy. Court held the matter was purely accounting-related with detailed investigation already conducted and necessary documents recovered. Considering applicants&#039; cooperation during interim protection, custodial interrogation would serve no purpose. Court noted complainant had filed cases under NI Act Section 138 before lodging criminal report, suggesting attempt to recover money through criminal proceedings. One applicant had resigned previously and cooperated with investigation. Court concluded custodial interrogation unnecessary and granted anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 110 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761124</link>
      <description>HC granted anticipatory bail to applicants charged under IPC Sections 406, 408, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477A read with Section 34 for financial fraud and conspiracy. Court held the matter was purely accounting-related with detailed investigation already conducted and necessary documents recovered. Considering applicants&#039; cooperation during interim protection, custodial interrogation would serve no purpose. Court noted complainant had filed cases under NI Act Section 138 before lodging criminal report, suggesting attempt to recover money through criminal proceedings. One applicant had resigned previously and cooperated with investigation. Court concluded custodial interrogation unnecessary and granted anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>