https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761125 Section 482 CrPC quashing in a Section 138/141 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution is to be used sparingly, and a complaint need only contain basic averments that the director was responsible for the company's business. The High Court noted that whether the accused was in fact not in charge of the company is ordinarily a matter for trial, not threshold interference. Because the complaint alleged joint responsibility for day-to-day affairs and financial transactions, and no unimpeachable material was produced to show lack of involvement, the summoning order was upheld and pre-trial quashing was declined. en-us Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 09:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761125 Section 482 CrPC quashing in a Section 138/141 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution is to be used sparingly, and a complaint need only contain basic averments that the director was responsible for the company's business. The High Court noted that whether the accused was in fact not in charge of the company is ordinarily a matter for trial, not threshold interference. Because the complaint alleged joint responsibility for day-to-day affairs and financial transactions, and no unimpeachable material was produced to show lack of involvement, the summoning order was upheld and pre-trial quashing was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761125