https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761126 Delhi HC dismissed defendants' applications for leave to defend under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC. Defendants admitted liability to repay amount but claimed repayment was due "as and when able" or when a third party was released from custody. Court found defendants' defence frivolous and vexatious as they admitted liability and had provided signed cheques to plaintiff with only dates to be filled. Since defendants raised no substantial defence and admitted the debt, leave to defend was refused and applications dismissed. en-us Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761126 Delhi HC dismissed defendants' applications for leave to defend under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC. Defendants admitted liability to repay amount but claimed repayment was due "as and when able" or when a third party was released from custody. Court found defendants' defence frivolous and vexatious as they admitted liability and had provided signed cheques to plaintiff with only dates to be filled. Since defendants raised no substantial defence and admitted the debt, leave to defend was refused and applications dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761126