<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 120 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the appellant to seek credit from the GST authority for Rs. 20,52,143 and Rs. 2,19,004, credited in the revised Trans-1 but not in the electronic credit ledger. Refund claims of Rs. 41,244 and Rs. 4,87,533 were remanded for reconsideration, as the Tribunal noted eligibility for Cenvat credit under existing law despite post-01.07.2017 payment. The appeal was disposed of with these directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 120 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the appellant to seek credit from the GST authority for Rs. 20,52,143 and Rs. 2,19,004, credited in the revised Trans-1 but not in the electronic credit ledger. Refund claims of Rs. 41,244 and Rs. 4,87,533 were remanded for reconsideration, as the Tribunal noted eligibility for Cenvat credit under existing law despite post-01.07.2017 payment. The appeal was disposed of with these directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>