<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 124 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761138</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging CENVAT credit eligibility on clutches. The assessee engaged in packing/re-packing/labelling/re-labelling/affixing MRP on automobile clutches, which constituted manufacture under Section 2(f)(iii) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Revenue contended goods procured from Unit 1 during April-May 2012 weren&#039;t subjected to manufacturing processes, making CENVAT credit of Rs.1,70,46,634 ineligible. Tribunal relied on identical facts in earlier case involving same appellant, holding when department collected duty on finished products, input credit cannot be denied alleging activity doesn&#039;t amount to manufacture. Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 124 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761138</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging CENVAT credit eligibility on clutches. The assessee engaged in packing/re-packing/labelling/re-labelling/affixing MRP on automobile clutches, which constituted manufacture under Section 2(f)(iii) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Revenue contended goods procured from Unit 1 during April-May 2012 weren&#039;t subjected to manufacturing processes, making CENVAT credit of Rs.1,70,46,634 ineligible. Tribunal relied on identical facts in earlier case involving same appellant, holding when department collected duty on finished products, input credit cannot be denied alleging activity doesn&#039;t amount to manufacture. Commissioner&#039;s order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>