<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 40 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39119</link>
    <description>The court interpreted section 271(2) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing that penalties for registered firms should be calculated based on tax assessed as if they were unregistered, rejecting the argument for penalties based on tax payable. The judgment aimed to ensure uniformity in penalty application, dismissing petitions seeking a different interpretation and upholding consistent penalty imposition across assesses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:41:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 40 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39119</link>
      <description>The court interpreted section 271(2) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing that penalties for registered firms should be calculated based on tax assessed as if they were unregistered, rejecting the argument for penalties based on tax payable. The judgment aimed to ensure uniformity in penalty application, dismissing petitions seeking a different interpretation and upholding consistent penalty imposition across assesses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>