https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761152 CESTAT Mumbai held that revocation of customs broker license and penalty imposition under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 was erroneous. The tribunal found licensing authority incorrectly interpreted authorization requirements, confusing client contact with document authorization. Charges under regulations 10(a), 10(d), 10(e), 10(i), and 10(n) were not proved, as authority relied on flimsy presumptions rather than concrete evidence. The tribunal noted absence of evidence showing incorrect advice to clients or attempts to influence customs officers. Revocation of license, forfeiture of security deposit, and Rs. 50,000 penalty were set aside, allowing the appeal. en-us Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 20:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761152 CESTAT Mumbai held that revocation of customs broker license and penalty imposition under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 was erroneous. The tribunal found licensing authority incorrectly interpreted authorization requirements, confusing client contact with document authorization. Charges under regulations 10(a), 10(d), 10(e), 10(i), and 10(n) were not proved, as authority relied on flimsy presumptions rather than concrete evidence. The tribunal noted absence of evidence showing incorrect advice to clients or attempts to influence customs officers. Revocation of license, forfeiture of security deposit, and Rs. 50,000 penalty were set aside, allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761152