<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761164</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions of Rs. 7,20,000 and Rs. 7,80,000, thus allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. It acknowledged the plausibility of past savings and inheritance, considering the assessee&#039;s age, joint family lifestyle, and business nature, despite the absence of account books. The voluntary disclosure under the PMGKY scheme significantly supported the assessee&#039;s explanations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761164</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additions of Rs. 7,20,000 and Rs. 7,80,000, thus allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal. It acknowledged the plausibility of past savings and inheritance, considering the assessee&#039;s age, joint family lifestyle, and business nature, despite the absence of account books. The voluntary disclosure under the PMGKY scheme significantly supported the assessee&#039;s explanations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>