<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 171 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761185</link>
    <description>Kerala HC upheld the constitutionality of Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) II and Section 145A requiring FIFO or Weighted Average Cost methods for inventory valuation, excluding LIFO method. The court rejected challenges under Article 14, finding no manifest arbitrariness as the provisions ensure uniform inventory valuation for assessees under profits and gains of business. The classification was reasonable, applying equally to all similar taxpayers. The court noted assessees retain freedom to maintain books using any recognized accounting method, but must follow prescribed methods for income computation. The retrospective operation from 01.04.2017 was declared invalid, which the revenue did not challenge. Writ appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 171 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761185</link>
      <description>Kerala HC upheld the constitutionality of Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) II and Section 145A requiring FIFO or Weighted Average Cost methods for inventory valuation, excluding LIFO method. The court rejected challenges under Article 14, finding no manifest arbitrariness as the provisions ensure uniform inventory valuation for assessees under profits and gains of business. The classification was reasonable, applying equally to all similar taxpayers. The court noted assessees retain freedom to maintain books using any recognized accounting method, but must follow prescribed methods for income computation. The retrospective operation from 01.04.2017 was declared invalid, which the revenue did not challenge. Writ appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>