<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 180 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761194</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petition challenging the order-in-original dated 28.03.2022 due to the appeal&#039;s dismissal on limitation grounds. The HC emphasized it cannot intervene under Article 226 unless the appeal order is set aside. The petitioner may pursue other remedies under the CGST Act, including addressing late notice receipt. The interim order was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 180 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761194</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petition challenging the order-in-original dated 28.03.2022 due to the appeal&#039;s dismissal on limitation grounds. The HC emphasized it cannot intervene under Article 226 unless the appeal order is set aside. The petitioner may pursue other remedies under the CGST Act, including addressing late notice receipt. The interim order was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>