https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458544 Land validly vested in the State and was lawfully brought within the forest notification regime, because the land reform notification excluded vesting in the Gaon Samaj and the later forest notifications identified the disputed plot by boundary and khasra details. The absence of a final forest notification did not negate the earlier statutory effect, and revenue entries in favour of the lessees could not create title, ownership or any enforceable interest. Procedural objections could not defeat the statutory vesting and forest claim where no written grant or other lawful source of title was shown. The consolidation authority was therefore right to restore the forest entry and cancel the contrary revenue entries. en-us Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 15:37:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458544 Land validly vested in the State and was lawfully brought within the forest notification regime, because the land reform notification excluded vesting in the Gaon Samaj and the later forest notifications identified the disputed plot by boundary and khasra details. The absence of a final forest notification did not negate the earlier statutory effect, and revenue entries in favour of the lessees could not create title, ownership or any enforceable interest. Procedural objections could not defeat the statutory vesting and forest claim where no written grant or other lawful source of title was shown. The consolidation authority was therefore right to restore the forest entry and cancel the contrary revenue entries. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458544