<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 2036 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458549</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding Section 80IC deduction despite an 18-day delay in filing the return. The tribunal held that the Central Board of Direct Taxes had condoned the delay through an order dated 29/03/2017, making the assessee eligible for the deduction. Following the precedent in CIT vs. Magnum Exports Private Limited, the tribunal directed the AO to consider Form 10CCB dated 25/09/2012 and examine the claim afresh on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 19:48:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 2036 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458549</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding Section 80IC deduction despite an 18-day delay in filing the return. The tribunal held that the Central Board of Direct Taxes had condoned the delay through an order dated 29/03/2017, making the assessee eligible for the deduction. Following the precedent in CIT vs. Magnum Exports Private Limited, the tribunal directed the AO to consider Form 10CCB dated 25/09/2012 and examine the claim afresh on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>