<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 708 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458540</link>
    <description>The court granted unconditional leave to defend due to the complex nature of the case, involving internal disputes and malafide intentions in filing the suit. It highlighted the failure to implead a necessary partner, indicating ulterior motives. The injunction was recalled, and status quo was maintained regarding disputed properties, ensuring protection of the claim&#039;s value until final resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:16:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 708 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458540</link>
      <description>The court granted unconditional leave to defend due to the complex nature of the case, involving internal disputes and malafide intentions in filing the suit. It highlighted the failure to implead a necessary partner, indicating ulterior motives. The injunction was recalled, and status quo was maintained regarding disputed properties, ensuring protection of the claim&#039;s value until final resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>