https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458536 In a boundary dispute over competing khasra numbers, the Court treated the prescribed revenue demarcation procedure as mandatory and held that a report based only on approximate measurements, without reliable permanent reference points, could not determine title or possession. The local commissioner's report was therefore rightly disregarded, and testimony derived from that discarded report could not independently prove the claim. The party seeking injunction also failed to establish that the entire suit property, including the vacant portion, fell within the asserted non-acquired khasra. The concurrent factual findings were left undisturbed in second appeal. en-us Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 15:45:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458536 In a boundary dispute over competing khasra numbers, the Court treated the prescribed revenue demarcation procedure as mandatory and held that a report based only on approximate measurements, without reliable permanent reference points, could not determine title or possession. The local commissioner's report was therefore rightly disregarded, and testimony derived from that discarded report could not independently prove the claim. The party seeking injunction also failed to establish that the entire suit property, including the vacant portion, fell within the asserted non-acquired khasra. The concurrent factual findings were left undisturbed in second appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458536