<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Stainless Steel Coil Manufacturer Wins CVD Refund Appeal; Retrospective Exemption Recognized by CESTAT.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82782</link>
    <description>The appellant, engaged in manufacturing stainless steel coils under the Advance Authorisation Scheme, challenged the adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection of their refund claim for Countervailing Duty (CVD). The Government initially imposed CVD but later exempted it through Notification No. 79/2017-Cus dated 13.10.2017 and DGFT Notification No. 33/2015-2020. Various High Courts upheld the retrospective applicability of Notification No. 79/2017 in similar cases. However, the refund was denied on the grounds that the appellant was not a party in those High Court cases. The CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to a refund of CVD along with applicable interest, as Notification No. 79/2017 has retrospective effect, granting exemption from CVD under the Advance Authorisation Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:34:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Stainless Steel Coil Manufacturer Wins CVD Refund Appeal; Retrospective Exemption Recognized by CESTAT.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82782</link>
      <description>The appellant, engaged in manufacturing stainless steel coils under the Advance Authorisation Scheme, challenged the adjudicating authority&#039;s rejection of their refund claim for Countervailing Duty (CVD). The Government initially imposed CVD but later exempted it through Notification No. 79/2017-Cus dated 13.10.2017 and DGFT Notification No. 33/2015-2020. Various High Courts upheld the retrospective applicability of Notification No. 79/2017 in similar cases. However, the refund was denied on the grounds that the appellant was not a party in those High Court cases. The CESTAT allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is entitled to a refund of CVD along with applicable interest, as Notification No. 79/2017 has retrospective effect, granting exemption from CVD under the Advance Authorisation Scheme.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:34:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>