https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761118 The writ petition under Article 226 challenged detention orders under Section 129 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 and questioned the competence of the issuing authority. Pending further hearing and exchange of affidavits, the petitioner sought release of the detained goods by offering security. The Court directed interim release of the goods on furnishing of a bank guarantee in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Rules, 2017, while leaving the merits of the statutory challenge open for later consideration. en-us Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:38:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761118 The writ petition under Article 226 challenged detention orders under Section 129 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017 and questioned the competence of the issuing authority. Pending further hearing and exchange of affidavits, the petitioner sought release of the detained goods by offering security. The Court directed interim release of the goods on furnishing of a bank guarantee in terms of Rule 140(1) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Rules, 2017, while leaving the merits of the statutory challenge open for later consideration. Case-Laws GST Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761118