<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 94 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761108</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC quashed an order passed under section 264 regarding a charitable organization&#039;s entitlement to benefits under sections 11 and 12. The petitioner had incurred expenditure for charitable purposes and applied income as required under section 11(1)(d), evidenced by Form 10B from their Chartered Accountant. However, due to a technical glitch, this application of income was not reflected in Form ITR-7, showing nil amount in the relevant column. The HC held that since the expenditure was undisputed and income was properly applied for charitable purposes, the petitioner was entitled to the benefit. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of the technical error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 94 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761108</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC quashed an order passed under section 264 regarding a charitable organization&#039;s entitlement to benefits under sections 11 and 12. The petitioner had incurred expenditure for charitable purposes and applied income as required under section 11(1)(d), evidenced by Form 10B from their Chartered Accountant. However, due to a technical glitch, this application of income was not reflected in Form ITR-7, showing nil amount in the relevant column. The HC held that since the expenditure was undisputed and income was properly applied for charitable purposes, the petitioner was entitled to the benefit. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration of the technical error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>