<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 90 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761104</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC quashed a reassessment notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had fully disclosed all material facts during original assessment proceedings, including details of immovable property transactions in response to s 142(1) notice. The Assessing Officer accepted the return and passed assessment order u/s 143(3). The court found the reassessment notice was based on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind, containing wrong figures regarding property transactions. Since there was no failure to disclose material facts and the notice was issued beyond four years, it lacked jurisdiction under proviso to s 147. The notice was quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 90 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761104</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC quashed a reassessment notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had fully disclosed all material facts during original assessment proceedings, including details of immovable property transactions in response to s 142(1) notice. The Assessing Officer accepted the return and passed assessment order u/s 143(3). The court found the reassessment notice was based on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind, containing wrong figures regarding property transactions. Since there was no failure to disclose material facts and the notice was issued beyond four years, it lacked jurisdiction under proviso to s 147. The notice was quashed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>