<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 79 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761093</link>
    <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, condoning a 351-day delay in filing appeal before CIT(A)-NFAC. The assessee explained the delay was due to bipolar disorder treatment since 2017 and residence in USA preventing timely compliance. While CIT(A)-NFAC rejected the explanation, ITAT considered the health condition and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration on merits, directing the assessee to cooperate promptly in proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:37:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 79 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761093</link>
      <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, condoning a 351-day delay in filing appeal before CIT(A)-NFAC. The assessee explained the delay was due to bipolar disorder treatment since 2017 and residence in USA preventing timely compliance. While CIT(A)-NFAC rejected the explanation, ITAT considered the health condition and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration on merits, directing the assessee to cooperate promptly in proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>