<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 74 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761088</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed interest deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) on loans advanced to subsidiary AAIPL for real estate business purposes. The assessee, engaged in real estate development, had advanced funds to its 87.5% subsidiary AAIPL, which further invested in foreign subsidiaries for overseas real estate projects. Despite no interest income from AAIPL due to commercial prudence and financial distress in foreign subsidiaries, the tribunal held that interest on borrowings remained allowable as business expenditure since loans were advanced for legitimate business purposes. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:37:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=776460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 74 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761088</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed interest deduction u/s 36(1)(iii) on loans advanced to subsidiary AAIPL for real estate business purposes. The assessee, engaged in real estate development, had advanced funds to its 87.5% subsidiary AAIPL, which further invested in foreign subsidiaries for overseas real estate projects. Despite no interest income from AAIPL due to commercial prudence and financial distress in foreign subsidiaries, the tribunal held that interest on borrowings remained allowable as business expenditure since loans were advanced for legitimate business purposes. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=761088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>